1 2

GM decision

GM decision

£0.00
£0.00
Sale Sold out

Please select a product option.

 Resource from the ENGAGE project, which won 'best open educational resource (2017)'

 

Following a EU rule change, the growing of GM crops across Europe will increase in many countries. It looks likely that GM foods such as breakfast cereals may be on our supermarket shelves within a year - but will many people choose them over GM-free alternatives?

In this activity students apply their knowledge about genes to learn why crops are genetically modified before evaluating health risks to decide which cereal they would buy.

 

Learning objective

  • Inheritance: Suggest arguments for and against genetic modification
  • Estimate risk: Weigh up the benefits and risks of an application of science to make a decision

    Blueprint curriculum link

    • Unit: Controlling reproduction
    • Concept: Genetic engineering: Genes are taken from one species and introduced into the genome of another by a process called genetic engineering
    • Skills: Decisions: Consider the consequences of technology for people and the environment
    • Learning stage: Analyse

    Activity contents

    • Teachers guide
    • PowerPoint file

    The activity is delivered as a zip file. After you checkout, you will be sent an email with the link to download it.

    Weblinks

    EU changes rules on GM crop cultivation

    The news story the activity is based on

    Overview of crop genetic engineering

    An interactive animation which outlines the process used to genetically modify a crop. Suitable for GCSE students and extending the more able at KS3.

     

    Customers rate us 4.7/5 based on 377 reviews.
    View full details

    Customer Reviews

    Based on 7 reviews
    43%
    (3)
    57%
    (4)
    0%
    (0)
    0%
    (0)
    0%
    (0)
    C
    Camilla Wold
    Engaging resource

    Students were interested in the topic and engaged well with the lesson. They were initially confused by the jigsaw but once they worked it out they found it a valuable tool for comparing the two types of foods.

    c
    camillabwold
    Engaging resource

    Students were interested in the topic and engaged well with the lesson. They were initially confused by the jigsaw but once they worked it out they found it a valuable tool for comparing the two types of foods.

    d
    danroth
    Engaging, GM Nation Debate and Science Education

    I explored RRI methodology proposed by the Engage project in my classes of a postgraduate course (masters and doctorate) in science education at the Sao Paulo State University (Unesp) in Brazil. Public participation in policy-making in the field of science and technology is a relatively new topic even for graduate students. Students should be able to recognise the challenges to enable lay people to participate in debates aiming to contribute to science and technology policy-making. Reports from the Engage project helped me to devise strategies to prepare people to take part in public debates, particularly in the level of local committees of water management and governance in Brazil. Graduate students of science education discovered a whole new landscape in which science and technology policies become open to public scrutiny, specifically under the realm of local and regional participatory structures of water management and governance in Brazil, i.e. river basin committees.

    m
    miroslawaw
    GM Decision

    This a great activity! I will use it with my grade 9 class.

    c
    camillabwold
    Engaging resources

    Students were interested in the topic and engaged well with the lesson. They were initially confused by the jigsaw but once they worked it out they found it a valuable tool for comparing the two types of foods.

    12